The Seagulls

Episode Summary

Title: The Seagulls - In 1972, George Hunt and Molly Warner discovered an unusual number of eggs in seagull nests on Santa Barbara Island off the coast of California. Further investigation revealed that around 10% of nests contained female-female pairings of seagulls. - This was the first scientific documentation of same-sex pairing in wild animals. The discovery challenged the prevailing scientific view that homosexuality was unnatural. - The seagull study received widespread media attention and was embraced by the gay rights movement in the 1970s as evidence that homosexuality existed in nature. - Over the next decades, hundreds more instances of same-sex behavior were documented across the animal kingdom, demonstrating the naturalness of homosexuality. - The seagull study is credited with opening the floodgates to this research. However, the same-sex pairing in seagulls was likely an aberration caused by chemical pollution, rather than a natural occurrence. - The story illustrates how the search for belonging can lead us to over-interpret anomalies in nature. But queer relationships have inherent worth, regardless of what occurs in other species.

Episode Show Notes

In the 1970s, as LGBTQ+ people in the United States faced conservatives whose top argument was that homosexuality is “unnatural,” a pair of young scientists discovered on a tiny island off the coast of California a colony of seagulls that included… a significant number of female homosexual couples making nests and raising chicks together. The article that followed upended the culture’s understanding of what’s natural and took the discourse on homosexuality in a whole new direction.

In this episode, our co-Host Lulu Miller grapples with the impact of this and several other studies about animal queerness on her life as a queer person.

Special thanks to the History is Gay (https://www.historyisgaypodcast.com/) podcast.

EPISODE CREDITS

Reported by - Lulu Millerwith help from - Sarah QariProduced by - Sarah QariOriginal sound design contributed by - Jeremy Bloomwith mixing help from - Arianne WackFact-checking by - Diane Kellyand Edited by - Becca Bressler

Our newsletter comes out every Wednesday. It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Sign up (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!

Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.

Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.

 

Leadership support for Radiolab’s science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Science Sandbox, a Simons Foundation Initiative, and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

 

Episode Transcript

SPEAKER_13: Radiolab is supported by Apple Card. Apple Card has a cash-back rewards program unlike other credit cards. You earn unlimited daily cash on every purchase, receive it daily, and can grow it at 4.15% annual percentage yield when you open a savings account. Apply for Apple Card in the Wallet app on iPhone. Apple Card subject to credit approval. Savings is available to Apple Card owners subject to eligibility requirements. Savings accounts provided by Goldman Sachs Bank USA. Member FDIC terms apply. SPEAKER_07: Crack cocaine plagued the United States for more than a decade. This week on Notes from America author Donovan Ramsey explains how the myths of crack prolonged a disastrous era and shaped millions of lives. Listen now wherever you get your podcasts. You're listening to Radiolab. SPEAKER_01: From WNYC. SPEAKER_13: Lot of Nasser. Lulu Miller. You ready to get wet? Wet? Mm-hmm. Because we are hopping in a boat. Okay. It's cold. It's windy. It's 1972. So in the boat with us is a young married couple, George Hunt. Now I'm just an old goofus. And Molly Warner. We didn't have white hair back then. We had darker hair. Oh, yes. Picture SPEAKER_13: them in flannels, big rubber boots, binoculars around their neck. Yeah, all those things. And they're about 30 miles off the coast of Southern California approaching this big imposing SPEAKER_12: hunk of rock. Called Santa Barbara Island. It's about a mile across, treeless. Mostly SPEAKER_13: cliff around the edges. Totally uninhabited. There's no dock there. So you have to row SPEAKER_14: up to waves on rocks and jump off at just the right time. And on top of that rock, Molly's SPEAKER_13: going to spot something that will change the lives of millions of people. All thanks to SPEAKER_13: gulls. Gulls like seagulls? See, George is an ornithologist and they had traveled all SPEAKER_13: the way out to the island because there was a wild colony out there he really wanted to study. Okay. Only problem was that it was the middle of the spring semester. And I had to teach. Back on the mainland at UC Irvine. So I had to leave Molly out there. Oh man. SPEAKER_13: After helping her get set up, he hops on the boat back home. That's a little, that's a SPEAKER_03: little cold. Yeah, it is not just emotionally cold. It was cold and windy. So, but you know, SPEAKER_13: George is a young professor trying to prove himself and Molly happens to be trained as an anthropologist. Yeah. So she agrees to spend a couple months out there, you know, watching. Oh, it's amazing to be in a, in a gull colony and you're just sitting there SPEAKER_14: and all of a sudden there's a falcon that flies over. The entire colony jumps up into the air and screams and circles. But what she was really there to observe was, well, SPEAKER_13: mating season. The female will beg for food going, I don't really remember what the males SPEAKER_14: say. I think we actually have George doing that. You probably do. The male starts to SPEAKER_02: make he a cuckuckuckuck, waving his wings. He gets on top, studies his wobbly legs on SPEAKER_13: her back, puts his cloaca next to hers. With the cloaca is the private part. Oh, it's a SPEAKER_13: little opening. Males and females both have them. And to finish the act, the male kisses his cloaca to hers and, and fertilizers. Can you watch a rejection happen versus an acceptance? SPEAKER_02: A rejection is the female walks away. Okay. She's not, she's not subtle. It's not that SPEAKER_13: different from a lot of places. So anyway, back to Molly, moon's coming out, stars, winds. SPEAKER_13: This is her existence is on this Island. And one morning it's about a week after the mating has begun. And she begins walking around looking at the nest and suddenly eggs are appearing. And so she's kind of going on this little Easter egg hunt. One egg. She's just marking two eggs, a little clipboard. How many eggs are in each nest? Yeah. Two eggs, three eggs. SPEAKER_12: When she sees this one nest that had six eggs in it, right. Which is way more than these SPEAKER_13: birds usually like. It would be like having septuplets. And as she goes along, two, two, SPEAKER_12: three, six, six, there was a good chunk of them. She's seeing that about one in 10 of SPEAKER_13: hundreds of nests has way more eggs than it's supposed to have. Of course, there weren't SPEAKER_14: any cell phones that would have been extremely useful. We did have a radio phone thing. So she radios to George. The communication was so awful. Like there's too many eggs. You SPEAKER_02: need to come out and see what's going on. And so I did. And she shows him around the SPEAKER_13: Island, all these nests just brimming with eggs. And I was absolutely thunderstruck. SPEAKER_13: You've never seen or even heard of so many eggs in one single nest. So then the question SPEAKER_14: was what's going on? They figured maybe there was something going on inside the birds that SPEAKER_13: was making them pump out so many extra eggs. So Molly went and trapped the birds, one of the couples from the nests with tons of eggs. I then euthanized them and dissected them. SPEAKER_13: Thank you for your service to science that pair. They just left six eggs. Yeah, gosh, SPEAKER_13: yeah. That's sad. I didn't even think about that. Yeah. So they left those eggs cold in SPEAKER_13: the wind. Okay. It's a very sad story. So George opens up the first bird, realizes it's the female. This species, the males and females are basically identical. And he looks and he sees the reproductive tract, ovaries. Perfectly fine. So then he takes a look at her mate. SPEAKER_12: I opened the second bird and we can see the ovaries. It's another female. I turned to SPEAKER_02: Molly and said, are you sure these two actually came from the same thing? Like this couldn't SPEAKER_13: have been a nesting pair. Yes, they were. You know, she was really quite indignant because SPEAKER_02: she's a very careful scientist. And she said, I'm absolutely sure. So at that point, we knew we had two females incubating eggs in the same nest. So they go back and check all SPEAKER_13: those other nests with six eggs. They find a way of identifying the sex without euthanizing them and discover they are all, all of them females. And as they watch them, they realize that they aren't just roommates. The females will mate with each other. Really? They're SPEAKER_02: having sex with each other. Wow. One of the females will get on top of the other female SPEAKER_02: and make the clucking sound as if she's the male. And will raise her wings, steady her SPEAKER_13: legs and kiss the cloacas. It's the whole same dance. Wow. Now they're not actually SPEAKER_13: making babies this way. They'll have to go get fertilized by a male somewhere else. But after that happens, the two females come together and incubate the eggs together. The chicks SPEAKER_14: are very cute when they're hatching these little fuzzy things. And when a chick does SPEAKER_13: catch these two ladybirds take turns throwing up their fish for the little guys to eat, SPEAKER_14: giving them the nice baby food, giving them the nice baby food. So the smaller gulls that SPEAKER_13: all in all George and Molly found that about 10% of the nests on Santa Barbara Island had two moms inside. And that was a whole my goodness. This is this is something new. As far as I SPEAKER_02: know, it was the first documentation of female female pairing in any wild animal. SPEAKER_13: All right, bias alert. Latif, my friend, you may recall that I too am a female female paired vertebrate. I am a lady married to a lady. We've got two kids. And so when I first heard about this, I was totally charmed by it. And so I thought, oh, this would be a fun Mother's Day story, maybe a Valentine's Day story, whatever. I wanted to just tell a little story about it. But when I started looking into it, it turned out that the story of the gulls is so much bigger than the gulls. They would become a kind of turning point in our understanding of how homosexuality works in the animal world and even how we think about and talk about homosexuality in us. SPEAKER_03: Okay, you sold me. All right. Okay, let's go. Yeah. So to get us there, I guess, first off, you have to know that at the time George and SPEAKER_13: Molly discovered these gulls, the scientific establishment's official stance on homosexuality was that it was unnatural, not really a part of the natural world, not a part of the animal kingdom. And that is a belief that as best as I can tell, was born back in the 1200s. Wow, we're going way back. All right. SPEAKER_13: So come with me there for a brief moment. We're going to meet a man named Thomas Aquinas, the famous philosopher priest who wrote in one of his most famous works that homosexuality was a quote, crime against nature. And this idea, this phrase, this belief, it's spread like wildfire all over Western Europe. A lot of the laws that banned homosexuality explicitly used that phrase crime against nature. But then with the rise of science in the 17th and 18th century, you also see how this belief gets embedded there too. Because whenever scientists did stumble across same sex mating in animals, which they did, they would either not publish on it and you can actually see records of like the notes that people sat on or accounts that got flat out rejected from publications. Or if they did write about it, they'd explain it away as like a quote, perversion or aberration, even abomination. SPEAKER_03: Scientists using that language. Yeah, totally. And then when Darwin comes SPEAKER_13: along in the 1800s, the ideas of evolution end up kind of bolstering the notion that homosexuality shouldn't appear in nature. Basically, if the whole point of life is to reproduce, why would you have a creature that can't reproduce? And then instead of perverse, it would get labeled with words like evolutionary outlier or fluke or mistake. SPEAKER_03: Right. And in what other scenario are like Darwin and the priests like pulling in the same direction? You know what I mean? Yeah, absolutely. And this sort of strange SPEAKER_13: alignment made it so like when a scientist would see a thing in nature, they could still manage to label it as unnatural. Even though I just saw it in nature. SPEAKER_13: Yeah. Yes. 100%. And in fact, when George and Molly first tried to publish on the seagulls in the 1970s, the ornithological journal they sent it to rejected it. SPEAKER_02: They said, well, this is so unusual. We want more data. So we said, sure, we'll go get more data. We got more data. So they did. Year after year, they kept collecting SPEAKER_13: data. They took photos. They got more and more research assistance to help. And finally, SPEAKER_02: it was sufficiently mind boggling to us that we said, well, send this to science. SPEAKER_13: George finally submits a paper to the journal Science. And in June of 1977, a paper is released called female female pairing in Western gulls, Lores accidentalis in Southern California. And basically the world goes crazy. It sets off this media frenzy. The phone doesn't stop SPEAKER_13: ringing. George remembers newspapers calling from all over the world. Can I speak to George SPEAKER_12: Hunt, please? Wanting to interview him. The London times, the Melbourne times. I'm calling SPEAKER_02: from India all over this country. Because in documenting these islands full of homosexual SPEAKER_13: gulls, George and Molly hadn't just challenged a central belief of science. They had clumsily detonated that centuries old justification that people were still using to try to keep homosexuality a crime. All right, so quickly lay of the land June 1977, when this paper drops over a hundred countries and a majority of US states still criminalized homosexuality, many based on Aquinas's old phrase that it was a quote crime against nature. This is historian Lillian Faderman. We have heard you referenced multiple SPEAKER_13: times as the mother of lesbian history. I won't call myself that, but if you want SPEAKER_11: to introduce me as that, I don't object. She lived through this era and said that 1977 was a very charged moment. Then the fight for LGBTQ rights. On one hand, there had been SPEAKER_13: all these strides. There were the first gay pride parades. The medical profession had SPEAKER_13: declassified homosexuality as a mental illness and more and more people started coming out SPEAKER_11: of the closet and winning rights. Yes. But in response to all that momentum, there came SPEAKER_12: a voice. The woman named Anita Bryant, maybe you've SPEAKER_13: heard of her. She's a pop singer and evangelical Christian. She did like the orange juice commercials, SPEAKER_03: right? Exactly. She was the spokesperson for the Florida Citrus Commission. Yeah. And a SPEAKER_13: spokesperson for the anti-gay movement. She called her organization Save Our Children SPEAKER_11: Against Homosexuals Incorporated. With the argument that homosexuals, they're very dangerous. And to try to convince people of this, she SPEAKER_13: would often point to nature saying stuff like, Not even barnyard animals do the disgusting SPEAKER_11: things that homosexuals do. That is, homosexuality is so much against nature that it's not to be found even among animals. She was a notoriously great organizer. Like SPEAKER_03: she could really mobilize people. Hugely. And this tactic of pointing to the supposed SPEAKER_13: empirical wrongness or deviance of homosexuals. Oh man, did it work. SPEAKER_14: It was a decisive end to Dade County's homosexual controversy. SPEAKER_13: Just two weeks before George and Molly's study dropped, she pulled off her first victory and it was a big one. She successfully organized voters in Miami to come out and vote to strip away legal protections for gay folks. They wanted no part of the law which protects SPEAKER_14: homosexuals. And so right on the heels of that, when this SPEAKER_13: scientific report on some pretty natural looking homosexuality comes out. SPEAKER_02: We got some really quite nasty letters about our work that, you know, this was bad. We were undermining proper beliefs. There were editorials slamming George's work SPEAKER_13: and even Congress jumped in. Really? SPEAKER_02: Yeah. In retrospect, I shouldn't have been surprised. SPEAKER_13: Yeah, he had received government funding from the National Science Foundation and some conservative congressmen were so upset about this that... Congress held up the NSF budget. SPEAKER_03: Wow. A tiny tangent, I don't know, for me at least, still kind of feels that public opinion over the morality of gay relationships or marriages has changed so drastically in the last few decades, at least in this country. It's like genuinely hard to put your mind back to understand like the Anita Bryant or the people who can't stomach even a scientist documenting this in seagulls. I don't think it's hard to go back there. No? SPEAKER_13: I mean, the Anita Bryants are alive and well. They're banning books. They're trying to dial back queer rights based on a really similar argument. Right, right. But the thing I feel like I need to confess that I didn't even realize until working on this story is that I held a version of this belief of Aquinas' old belief too. Really? Yeah. I mean, I didn't grow up with religion. I woke into a world where I realized I was queer at a time where like there was so much more acceptance. Right. But if I did grow up with anything, it's like my scientist father evolution. Like I just, I absolutely believed it was unnatural. And I would hear every so now and then, like I grew up outside of Boston, there were like gay swans in Boston Common and I was like, oh, but it felt like a byproduct of captivity. So about a year ago, when I first heard about George and Molly's study, like I had this 40 year delayed version of what happened for a lot of queer people when the study came out. I was absolutely thrilled. SPEAKER_03: SPEAKER_11: That's Lillian Faderman again. Gay periodicals all over the country picked up on this immediately. They published cartoons of like the gay, the SPEAKER_13: lesbian seagulls, like pooping in Anita Bryant's eye. Yes. Here's one. There were songs. SPEAKER_08: And plays. One show actually had two women in seagull SPEAKER_04: outfits. That's Pamela Gray. She wrote one of those SPEAKER_13: plays. I went to it and afterward I went up and introduced SPEAKER_02: myself to the director who just about fell over. SPEAKER_13: There were boat rides out to go see the gulls. I gave up a couple of Sundays to lead trips SPEAKER_02: out to the islands. We got on a boat. This is Edgar Sochil, a queer ecologist who went out to the island to just commune. SPEAKER_08: It was super loud. With his queer avian elders. SPEAKER_08: It was like 24 hours. For a time, the lesbian seagull really became SPEAKER_13: like a mascot in the gay pride movement. Yeah. Yeah. Right. SPEAKER_03: Yes. Amazing. SPEAKER_13: But in the anti-gay movement, the gulls did not have an effect. Anita Bryant only went on to have more wins in the following years, getting more discriminatory practices in place in other cities. And in the 80s, when the question of homosexuality finally reaches the Supreme Court in Bowers v. Hardwick, the justices vote against legalizing homosexual sex for the whole country, again, calling it unnatural in the opinion. Wow. But if you turn, if you mosey on over to the halls of science, you see that the seagull study ushered in a flood or pardon me, a parade of queer animals tromping through under the scientific record. Just hundreds of studies, starting with the hoofed animals. SPEAKER_13: Deer, giraffe, antelope and gazelles. This is John McGahan. He illustrated a whole SPEAKER_13: book of queer animals, wild sheep, goats and buffalo. Then you got primates, gins, bonobos, SPEAKER_13: gorillas, orangutans. That's Elliot Shrefer, who just came out with a book on the science of queer animals. Bonobo females having sex will get face to SPEAKER_06: face to do it. They will rub their clitorises against each other to have loud, rapturous orgasms. Heading underwater. We have the clown fish. SPEAKER_13: This is Christine Wilkinson. She's a biologist and ecologist and the Amazon River dolphin. SPEAKER_04: Is that the pink one? Yeah, they're pink. Okay. They love cuddling, which I think is very sweet. Oh, that's nice. SPEAKER_05: There's also like whales, seals, manatees, bottlenose dolphins. Males will bond for life. SPEAKER_06: And a study put it at 2.4 times an hour on average that the males are having sex with each other. That's so much. SPEAKER_06: It sounds exhausting. Just when I thought I'd covered all of them. SPEAKER_05: Rattlesnakes, hyenas, marsupials, hedgehogs, rodents. They just kept coming. Bats. SPEAKER_04: Having oral sex with each other. In flight? Upside down. Oh, I love it. SPEAKER_05: And you have birds, geese, swans, and ducks. Swallows, warblers, finches, sparrows, black birds and crows, birds of paradise, other birds. SPEAKER_13: But the animal that really took the cake for me is this striped little lizard called the SPEAKER_04: New Mexico whiptail lizard. This entire species is made up of females. SPEAKER_03: You can have a species with no males? Turns out you can. SPEAKER_04: These les-y-les-ies actually simulate compilation with each other, which increases their fertility. They then reproduce asexually, but instead of popping out a clone, they produce twice SPEAKER_04: the number of chromosomes, which get recombined to form more genetically diverse offspring, just like they would in a fertilized egg. No. Yes. No. SPEAKER_03: Never heard of that before. So they're freaking going to persist. SPEAKER_04: What the last nearly 50 years of scientific study has revealed is that there is not a SPEAKER_13: single corner of this planet where animals are not being super freaking queer. SPEAKER_03: Wow. Right? SPEAKER_13: And I do want to just say that I'm focusing on same-sex mating, but the story of sexual fluidity in nature, animals being multiple sexes at once or changing sexes over a lifetime, that has been discovered to be such a deep part of nature too. But for the same-sex mating thing, as scientists looked closely and measured oxytocin levels or counted offspring survival rates or done the science thing on it, they're seeing all these benefits, like evolutionary benefits. Same-sex mating can strengthen hunting alliances. It can help resolve conflict during resource scarcity. It can reduce stress and strengthen social bonds, which is really good for fitness. And it can even increase the survival rate of offspring. Huh. How? So my favorite example of this is in white-tailed deer. Males will mate with one another. And there are these societies, these all male societies of deer called velvet horns that roam the forest in packs of like two to seven. And they don't have full on big antlers. They have these, these little velvet ones, um, so they don't fight. And so that leaves them healthier than the other ones because they're not getting injured. And these all male packs will take in orphaned fawns and raise them and protect them. SPEAKER_13: And learning about the sheer breadth of how queerness is a part of nature, this thread that was there all along, but we missed, but I missed, it changed my understanding of how I fit on the tree of life. SPEAKER_06: There can be a loneliness to being LGBT that in a kind of broad existence sense, Elliot Schreffer again, That we are a blip of a strange time of human culture that created those and that without foundation in the past and without future that this kind of, it can feel annihilating. And I love the idea that queerness is, does not make us an anomaly, does not separate us from the natural world, but instead it is our heritage as animals. SPEAKER_13: I would love to end the story right here, but I can't because after a short break, I have a lesson to learn about the dangers of finding your belonging in nature. SPEAKER_03: Stick with us. We'll be back. SPEAKER_05: Lulu here. If you ever heard the classic Radiolab episode, sometimes behave so strangely, you SPEAKER_13: know that speech can suddenly leap into music and really how strange and magic sound itself can be. We at Radiolab take sound seriously and use it to make our journalism as impactful as it can be. And we need your help to keep doing it. The best way to support us is to join our membership program, The Lab. This month, all new members will get a t-shirt that says sometimes behave so strangely. To check out the t-shirt and support the show, go to radiolab.org slash join. Radiolab is supported by Capital One with no fees or minimums. Banking with Capital One is the easiest decision in the history of decisions. Even easier than deciding to listen to another episode of your favorite podcast. And with no overdraft fees, is it even a decision? That's banking reimagined. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See Capital One dot com slash bank Capital One N.A. member FDIC. Radiolab is supported by Apple Card. Apple Card has a cash back rewards program unlike other credit cards. You earn unlimited daily cash on every purchase, receive it daily and can grow it at four point one five annual percentage yield. When you open a savings account, apply for Apple Card in the wallet app on iPhone. Apple Card subject to credit approval. Savings is available to Apple Card owners subject to eligibility requirements. Savings accounts provided by Goldman Sachs Bank USA member FDIC. Terms apply. SPEAKER_10: After but her emails became shorthand in 2016 for the media's deep focus on Hillary Clinton's server hygiene at the expense of policy issues, is history repeating itself? You can almost SPEAKER_01: see an equation again, I would say, led by the times in Biden being old with Donald Trump being under dozens of felony indictments. Listen to On the Media from WNYC. Find On SPEAKER_10: the Media wherever you get your podcasts. SPEAKER_03: Lotte, Lulu, Radiolab, Gulls. And where are we going next? All right. So we need to take SPEAKER_13: a brief pit stop in Washington, D.C., because about 30 years after George Amalie first discovered the Gulls, the quote unquote lesbian seagulls make an appearance at the Supreme Court. The SPEAKER_03: Gulls did? Kind of, yeah. So in 2003, Lawrence v. Texas, the case that will overturn the SPEAKER_13: remaining bans on queer sex and legalize it for the whole country, make it a constitutional right. It's this huge victory. There was a brief that was filed that said basically you can't call homosexuality a crime against nature because look how common it is in nature. And they footnote this book in the middle of which is a section complete with illustrations on the lesbian Gulls. Wow. And so whether or not any justice like open that book and changed their mind because of that, I do love to just know that the homosexual seagulls were there that day, like cheering, cheering from the rafters. Cheering from the footnotes. Yeah, SPEAKER_13: cheering from the footnotes. Molly, this all kind of started with your eye. That's right. It started with you noticing something. And I think whether or not it's a big part of your life now, I know that I at least feel this odd gratitude to the grueling spring you spent out there because in a real way, it is part of why I feel a deeper sense of belonging than maybe like a queer woman 50 years ago. So I guess I just kind of wanted to say thank you. Well, I appreciate that. Thank you. SPEAKER_13: So what I'm really hoping I can do next is actually go out to the island. I'm trying right now to get my editor to send me with my wife and our two little boys to go camp there for a night so we can, you know, collect the sounds of the gulls and then at night be nesting down with our little brood in our little nest and picturing that there's like female-female pairs with their little nests and just feeling like this oneness. But you don't have a female-female pairing died out. SPEAKER_02: Wait, what? What? SPEAKER_13: So there aren't, there's still seagulls, but the island is heteronous. How did that happen? Well, George's theory is that back in the 70s, chemicals like DDT were getting into the birds, but for some reason were more toxic to the males, which left an island without that many males around. SPEAKER_02: And a female that's primed to mate will mate with the best prospect available. So they pair up with another female. And once DDT was banned, the male population SPEAKER_13: could rebound. So the females didn't need to pair up anymore. That's his theory. Has it been seen since on the islands that you know of? SPEAKER_02: Not that I know of. Do you guess that like in these 30 years, 40 SPEAKER_13: years, do you think sometimes it happens just because of... I have not seen it since. Okay. SPEAKER_02: Nobody has told me they saw them. But isn't it hard to see with the naked eye? SPEAKER_13: Sorry to interrupt, but couldn't it be happening without us realizing? SPEAKER_02: It could be happening without us realizing, but the eggs are big and obvious. And there are enough people walking around in gull colonies and dealing with gulls in one way or another. People would be aware of lots of eggs, especially after what we had. But no, I don't think it's going on now. Sorry. SPEAKER_13: I know. I was like as a queer person. I can hear you. Please tell me they still SPEAKER_02: like doing that. No, no. But I appreciate you, George Hunt, SPEAKER_13: as a just man wed to the facts and the observations, which is how we got here. But yeah, there's a deflation in the like, you know, you want a certain story sometimes. SPEAKER_02: Yes. So to just sum that all up, it means that SPEAKER_13: the animal that opened the floodgates to all the research, which has helped us see the naturalness of homosexuality in nature was most likely a fluke. Which honestly knocked SPEAKER_13: the wind out of me. It made me feel embarrassed. Okay. I mean, what is your deal with these queer animals? Okay. So, this is someone very close to me. My wife, Grace. Is this the first time I've dragged you under the microphone in 10 years of being together? I think. Yeah. And I asked her to talk to me because the whole time I've been working on this, Grace has been side eyeing what she calls your pathological obsession with finding queer animals, like SPEAKER_13: one book after another of gay animal stories started popping up in our home. No matter how many times they put them away, they would be back where they started. And like, I thought it was cute at first, but then it kept going. It almost, to me, it felt like you were seeking validation of our relationship in a certain way, almost. Oh, whoa. Of our relationship. Not like our relationship specifically, but of like your own experience of being queer. And though at first I kind of denied that, the more we talked. I thought you said at some point that it like brought reassurance to you. Yeah. The more I did realize that maybe they were like giving me something like a, like a, a shield against a message that you can get as you walk through the world as a queer family. What do you mean? I mean, then the state next door, the attorney general SPEAKER_13: three years ago wanted to scratch me off my son's birth certificate. We each have a kid who's biological and one who's not. And for the non-biological parent, we're currently allowed to both be on the birth certificate, but anyone in the gay community knows that like you want to also adopt your child because you don't know where rights are going and the process of adopting your own child to have the state officially recognize each of us. You have to submit yourself to background check. You have to submit yourself to a house visit knowing that the presumption is you're probably not fit. You have to like experience looking at your floors and like your body and wondering, oh God, there's a dust bunny under this part of my kitchen. Oh, what is in my cupboards? Am I too messy today? There is a, I mean, there's literally a coffee stain on my pants right now and, and it, and, and just that process, like any broccolaca on the street, it seems can go make a baby and the state's fine with it. But should it be two women or should it be two men or should there be a trans person involved and you'd like to adopt that child, your own child, you have to prove that you're fit. I mean, I get that. You know, when we're in public sometimes with our kids and it's like, you know, if they're misbehaving, it feels worse because we're two moms and you're like, oh, I don't want it to reflect badly on us. Right. They're like, see, it is bad for them. I don't know. There's just something so like profoundly SPEAKER_13: like a fresh drink of water to just like, you know, and that's why I'm cherry picking the studies where the homo animals have higher offspring survival rates and where it's about like species, like where I'm like, it's good for a community. It's good for a kid. I mean, it just makes me sad that you think of it like that. It makes me sad that those laws are still contributing to you feeling gross, you know, like, or to delegitimizing our relationship. I mostly feel angry, FYI. But I think that the salient feeling is disgust or, or, or like wrongness. Yeah, I don't know. It's like the fear that there are some people who think you would be dangerous to their kid. And I, there's a low grade always trying to prove otherwise. Yeah. But I feel like those like all the discriminatory practices should be taken away just because not because we're like human beings, not because we also exist in nature. Do you know what I mean? Like, why do we need to prove our worth by existing in nature? Why not just SPEAKER_13: acknowledge that like, whatever the relationships are like, it's love. Like it's all it is. Like, it's just loving people and there's nothing wrong with that. Oh my God. What time SPEAKER_12: is it? Do we have to pick up our kids? Holy shit. Oh my God. We got to go. Okay. Um, oh SPEAKER_13: God, we're going to be late. Last mom's at daycare and then they'll be like, lesbians. So pick up their kids on time. She's putting on her jacket. She's leaving. This episode SPEAKER_03: was reported by Lulu Miller with help from Sara Khari and produced by Sara Khari with help from Tanya Chawla, Heather Radke, Andrew Vignales and Aketi Foster-Keys. It was edited SPEAKER_13: by Becca Bresler, sound designed by Jeremy Blum and dialogue mixing by Arian Wack. Special SPEAKER_03: thanks to Michael Cheadle, Harsha Dasrati, Sean McKeithin and Sarita Bhatt. We want to give a huge shout out to the podcast Breaking Green Ceilings, which amplifies underheard voices in nature and ecology. That's where Lulu first learned about the Seagull study on their episode with Edgar Sochil, who you met in our piece. SPEAKER_13: Elliott Schreffer's book on queerness in nature is called Queer Ducks and Other Animals. It's a great read if you want to go deeper on some of the science of this stuff. And I am excited to say that our resident artist on staff, Jared Bartman, designed a patch, an embroidered patch of the gay seagulls. It is retro. It's got a sunsetty rainbow and you can get it if you become a sustaining member of Radiolab by joining our membership program, The Lab. Just go to radiolab.org slash join. That's radiolab.org slash join. Stick with us. Happy pride. Happy summer. SPEAKER_09: Squawk! Hi, I'm Maureen and I'm calling from Charlottesville, Virginia. Radiolab was created by Jad Abumrad and is edited by Soren Wheeler. Lulu Miller and Latif Nasser are our co-hosts. Dylan Keefe is our director of sound design. Our staff includes Simon Adler, Jeremy Blum, Becca Brusson, Michael Kessler, Rachel Cusick, Aketi Foster-Keys, W. Harry Fortuna, David Gable, Maria Paz-Gutierrez, Sindhu Nayanthambangan, Matt Keelty, Annie McEwen, Alex Neeson, Sara Khari, Anna Raskwith-Paz, Sarah Sonbach, Arian Wack, Pat Walters, and Molly Webster. Our fact checkers are Diane Kelly, Emily Krieger, and Natalie Middleton. SPEAKER_08: Hi, this is Tamara from Pasadena, California. Leadership support for Radiolab science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Science Sandbox Assignments Foundation Initiative, and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. SPEAKER_00: WNYC Studios is supported by On Being with Krista Tippett. I'm Krista Tippett of On Being, where we take up the big questions of meaning for this world now. In our new podcast season, we're going to have a different human conversation about AI and also the intelligence of our bodies, grief and joy, social creativity and poetry, and so much more. A conversation to live by every Thursday.